When to use this
Use this after you have reviewed analyses and deliberately added the required tables, figures, and notes to a Results Notebook.
Why it matters
Academic reporting needs a transparent separation between numerical evidence, researcher interpretation, and literature-supported discussion.
Step-by-step instructions
1. Save each verified analysis as an immutable result.
2. Add only the evidence you intend to report to a Results Notebook.
3. Open Academic Results Studio from Results & Reports or the notebook.
4. Choose Thesis, Journal, or Professional reporting mode.
5. Review the Results outline, tables, sample sizes, warnings, and source-analysis links.
6. Open Discussion and add reviewed interpretation in the source notebook where prompted.
7. Export DOCX or PDF and inspect the final pagination, captions, notes, and disclosure statements.
Expected outputs
A structured evidence view with thesis or article headings, source-linked tables, a researcher-controlled Discussion scaffold, and notebook exports.
How to interpret the results
The Studio reports stored numerical evidence. Discussion prompts are not findings: theoretical explanations, literature comparisons, implications, and causal claims must be written and reviewed by the researcher.
Common mistakes
Do not treat missing sections as evidence, move unreviewed AI text into a report, or infer causality from association. Always inspect the exported file before use.
Was this article helpful?
Your response helps the methodology team improve this documentation.